|
O
Powerful Western Star
naturally divides into two contrasting but interconnected partslike
two voices engaged in a rapt conversation. The first part is a brilliant
speculative account of the cultural situation of poetry at the end
of the twentieth century. In deeply provocative essays like "Words
& Books, Poetry & Writing" and "What About All
This . . ." Foley explores the radical changes now affecting
the serious literary artist. I can hardly praise these brief but
powerful essays enough. No one who reads them carefully will look
at the issues in entirely the same way. Although I supposedly occupy
an opposing position to Foleys in the notoriously divided
landscape of contemporary poetry, his theoretical essays have changed
and expanded my sense of the cultural moment.
Foleys
speculative essays do so many things well that I cannot do them
justice in so brief a space, but it may help to explain what they
do not attempt. Although genuinely learned, Foleys theoretical
essays are in no sense academic articles. They are not even conventional
essays in the sense of offering a single linear argument. Like the
critical work of Marshall McLuhan or Ezra Pound, two writers he
admires, Foleys prose proceeds by contrast and allusion, juxtaposition
and suggestive leap. He is a master of that most difficult and often
abused form, experimental prose, because he understands that good
innovative writing is not only original but also interesting.
Great
advances in literary theory are nowadays supposed to happen only
in the universitycertainly not in the undisciplined precincts
of bohemia. Foleys speculative essays, however, demonstrate
the truth behind Pounds famous assertion that "Artists
are the antennae of the race." Artists are usually the first
to pick up the vibrations of cultural change. Consequently, major
shifts in poetics are usually registered first by practicing artists
with a reflective bent. The artist witnesses something surprising
in his or her own creative process or milieu that current theory
does not explain or accommodate. In trying to describe the new developmentindeed
sometimes just by providing an evocative image or metaphor for others
to developthe artist articulates a decisive shift in cultural
sensibility long before academic critics ever notice its existence.
Kafka, Borges, and Beckett preceded Kristeva, Barthes, and Baudrillard.
And will also survive them.
If
Foley is a provocative and original theorist, he is also always
a writer. Surely, part of the power these general essays command
derives from being so well writtennot merely sharply phrased
and compellingly argued but also deeply imbued with passionate feeling.
Foley has brought his full artistic intelligence to the critical
task. "Words & Books, Poetry & Writing" simultaneously
provides the intellectual stimulation of criticism and the imaginative
pleasures of poetry. What one remembers from the essay is not only
the remarkable argument it unfolds (and they are numerous), but
also its many moments of lyrical insight. The great modern poet-criticsEliot,
Pound, Auden, Jarrell, and othersalways understood that ideal
criticism was not merely intellectual but emotional, spiritual,
and sensory. Even the cerebral Eliot filled his essays with memorable
images and seething suppressed emotion. What academic would describe
the process of imaginative synthesis quite as concretely as Eliot
does in "The Metaphysical Poets":
A
poets mind . . . is constantly amalgamating disparate experience;
the ordinary mans experience is chaotic, irregular, fragmentary.
The latter falls in love, or reads Spinoza, and these two experiences
have nothing to do with each other, or with the noise of the typewriter
or the smell of cooking; in the mind of the poet these experiences
are always forming new wholes.
The
second part of O Powerful Western Star is less intellectually
provocative but equally valuable and original. The later sections
of the book provide informed, detailed, and passionate accounts
of Bay Area artistic life over the past half-century. These local
investigations also go beyond the standard limits of literary criticism
and explore the conjunction of painting, film, music, and poetry.
They combine cultural history and critical reportage. No critic
since Thomas Parkinson has written with such generous attention
and persuasive intelligence about Northern Californias literary
bohemia. Being a hard-hearted critic, I sometimes wish Foley were
more demanding of certain writers. High standards are the necessary
precondition for regional culture of enduring significancea
lesson inevitably forgotten by local literary boosters. But I understand
the nature of Foleys critical enterprise, which is to establish
with intelligence and historical purpose the context for appreciation.
Consequently, Foley never condescends to mere objectivity. Convinced
that San Francisco has been the epicenter of late twentieth century
American poetry, he is a passionate advocate of all he surveys.
Perhaps
no recent writer has done more than Foley to foster a serious and
informed critical conversation about West Coast literature. Not
surprisingly for the author of "Light, Breath, and the Empty
Page," he has not confined this enterprise to the printed page.
Foley has conducted a lively and ambitious weekly literary radio
show, Cover to Cover, on KPFA as well as a substantial weekly
review, "Foleys Books," in the online journal Alsop
Review while also publishing essays and reviews in various periodicals.
He has also been an active presence in the Bay Area lecture sceneboth
as a poet and lecturer. (It may surprise some readers that Foleys
finely crafted speculative essay, "Words & Books, Poetry
& Writing," originated as a performance piece scripted
for two voices.) O Powerful Western Star gathers a sampling
of these engaged and engaging critical pieces. For the first time
readersespecially those outside the Bay Areawill have
the opportunity to see the work of one of the most thought-provoking
and truly iconoclastic critics now active.
No
California writer will need to be told the importance of Foleys
critical enterprise. Although the Bay Area has played an important
role in American letters since the days of Jack London, Frank Norris,
and Ambrose Bierce, the region remains ignored or underrepresented
in standard literary criticism and history. California poets in
particular have suffered critical neglect. Poets as different as
Robinson Jeffers, Yvor Winters, Kenneth Rexroth, William Everson,
Josephine Miles, Edgar Bowers, and Weldon Kees all remain obscure
or undervalued in the broader literary world. Only the Beats managed
to capture and sustain national attentionmostly for socio-political
reasonsand in the intervening half century California has
slowly slipped in the national literary consciousness.
The
relative obscurity of California writers originates at least partly
in local cultural conditions. The Bay Area has often celebrated
its own literary talent, but it has seldom done much to preserve,
study, and meaningfully debate local achievements. The apparatus
of literary fame hardly exists locally. There are no great quarterlies
in California, and few literary journals of any sort that publish
essays and reviews. This lack of public critical discourse and serious
reviewing has made it difficult to develop local critical talent
anywhere outside the university. If California has never lacked
major writers in the modern era, it has consistently lacked significant
critics seriously engaged with local writers. Foley addresses this
problem in the most direct way possible: by writing with passionate
intelligence about his milieu. On the radio, the Internet, and the
printed page, he has created a conversation about the art and literature
of the West. In O powerful Western Star a representative
selection of Foleys essays has finally been gathered in book
form. How can West Coast readers be anything but grateful?
|