|
At
the age of fifty-eight Frederick Morgan has become one of the most
interesting young poets in America. With the publication of his
first collection, A Book of Change, in 1972, Morgan, who
for the past thirty years had been shaping American literary taste
as the editor of The Hudson Review, suddenly emerged as an
ambitious and serious new poet. Having made his literary debut at
fifty, Morgan lost no time in catching up to his contemporaries.
He published widely, and like a young poet trying to define his
personal voice, he tested many themes and styles with an energy
and audaciousness that has characterized his work ever since. Like
a young poet too, Morgan published many unsuccessful attempts in
the process of discovering himself, but he never stopped to count
his losses. He was always at hand with something new. "One must
shoot the works and not hold back" he commented in a poem, and he
has stayed true to his word. His second book, Poems of the Two
Worlds, appeared in 1977 immediately followed in 1978 by a remarkable
collection of prose parables, The Tarot of Cornelius Agrippa.
Now two years later, a third book of poems, Death Mother and
Other Poems, has appeared, and for the first time it is possible
to get some perspective on Morgan's ten year transformation from
editor to poet.
Death
Mother and Other Poems is Morgan's best collection to date and
confirms that he has become a stronger poet with each succeeding
volume. More importantly, Death Mother is the first collection
in which Morgan has fully realized himself as a poet. He has discovered
his real subject matter, and this vision has given his work a focus
it sometimes lacked in his earlier books. Each new book an author
publishes can retrospectively change the earlier work. Poems
of the Two Worlds contained many excellent pieces, but judged
from the perspective of this new book, the older collection now
seems like a brilliant miscellany. A few early poems like "From
a Forgotten Book" or "The Door" from Poems of the Two Worlds
now acquire an additional resonance while other pieces which
at the time seemed equally impressive now sound uncharacteristic
and a little off-key. What is most surprising is how much of Morgan's
eclectic background he has been able to bring together defining
his real voice. He is not limited to one style or tone. He can work
as easily in metred verse as free. What defines his voice is not
merely formal principles although one can point to certain
formal characteristics in his best work simplicity of diction,
dramatic shifts of tone between stanzas, a strong sense of the line.
Instead, what distinguishes Morgan's poetry is the serious quality
of his imagination, his severe vision of life.
The
clarity of this underlying vision is why Death Mother succeeds
more than Morgan's earlier collections, for success here is not
a matter of which volume contains the most good poems but rather
of which book creates the most supportive context. Morgan is trying
to articulate a vision of existence, and the immediacy and authenticity
of this vision must be communicated before the individual poems
can acquire their full importance. In retrospect, one can see how
his early poems do not gain the force and clarity from their context
that the poems in Death Mother do, and in Morgan's case this
integrity is crucial. The surface simplicity of his best work hides
a complex harmony of images and ideas that need a larger structure
in which to operate. This need for a larger structure may explain
why the best of Morgan's first three books was The Tarot of Cornelius
Agrippa (which unfortunately was also the least well known).
This sequence of mysterious prose parables inspired by a deck of
seventeenth century Tarot cards marked Morgan's full maturity as
a writer. Somehow the demands of the parable form, the set interplay
between his words and the illustrations of the cards, perhaps the
very notion of a finite set of variations around a given theme all
focused Morgan's imagination into creating an original and nearly
perfect book. Now in Death Mother Morgan transfers the control
he learned in prose to his poetry, and the results are an equally
original and distinctive book.
Morgan's
new book is organized around three longer poems. The first of these
poems is the title sequence which sets out the questions which the
rest of the book tries to answer. "Death Mother" explores the myths
of death, not only classical myths like the Hindu death goddess,
Kali, but also mythic confrontations with death on a personal level
inexplicable experiences that linger obsessively in the memory.
Biography mixes with history and dream, and the reader is not always
sure whether Morgan is speaking from personal experience or in a
persona. Yet the ambiguity points out the underlying theme of the
poem man's inability to come to terms with death. The ambiguity
is also part of the reason why "Death Mother" is such an effective
poem, even if the reader tries to resist it (for it is an uncomfortable
poem to read). Like Eliot in "The Waste Land" Morgan creates a chorus
of voices that switch back and forth, and no sooner does the reader
hear and understand one voice than another comes into play surprising
us with something new. For example, one sections begins:
Death
is the least of things to be feared
because while we are it is not
and when it comes we are not
and so we never meet it at all.
These
lines register immediately as familiar, comfortable philosophy or
as poetry of a very minor sort. Then suddenly Morgan catches us
off guard in the next stanza:
That
was a Greek way of avoiding the issue -
which is, that ever since the blood-drenched moment
of primal recognition,
death has lived all times in us
and we in her, commingled . . .
The
quick change of perspectives in which the reader realizes that the
first lines which sounded so trustworthy were totally ironic and
the dramatic juxtaposition of a violent alternative gives these
two stanzas a cumulative power they could never achieve separately.
Morgan cuts between moods and scenes in an almost cinematic way
giving the poem a speed and power that breaks down any resistance
the reader may offer to its bitter vision of existence.
"Death
Mother" is the best of the three sequences Morgan includes in the
book, but "Orpheus to Eurydice," which comes midway, also deserves
close attention. This gentle, ambiguous sequence of love poems marks
the point in the book where Morgan modulates into quieter, more
affirmative poems. These poems address an ambiguous "you" which
seems simultaneously to be a dead lover, the Muse (both in the aspect
of a creator and destroyer), and the poet himself, but on at least
one level the sequence is a problematic reworking of the Orpheus
legend from a poet who believes in the impossibility of an afterlife:
How
to make the descent, then,
to your silent mirror?
The old paths are blocked by
history's debris
and we find we dislike the new ones . . .
The
situation of the poet in "Orpheus to Eurydice" is the central clue
in understanding what Morgan is trying to accomplish in Death
Mother. In their own way most of the important poems in this
new book are one-way conversations with the dead. For Morgan poetry
has become his only avenue to the underworld, and the lonely act
of writing without any assurance of success has become his form
of prayer. In an interview with Peter Brazeau in New England
Review, Morgan confessed that he had tried to write poetry for
thirty years without ever being able to finish a poem to his satisfaction.
It took a tragic event to loosen his thirty year writer's block
the suicide of his son, John. This shocking death plus the
break-up of his second marriage forced Morgan to release his energy
in poetry. In a sense Death Mother is the book he has been
trying to write ever since, and the pain, courage, and vision of
his experience give the book its power and integrity.
Having
discovered himself as a poet in the pain of his son's death, it
is not surprising that Morgan's particular strengths as a writer
all come together in "February 11, 1977," a poem which commemorates
the anniversary of that death.
February
11, 1977
to
my son John
You
died nine years ago today.
I see you still sometimes in dreams
in white track-shirt and shorts, running,
against a drop of tropic green.
It seems to be a meadow, lying
open to early morning sun:
no other person is in view,
a quiet forest waits beyond.
Why do you hurry? What's the need?
Poor eager boy, why can't you see
once and for all you've lost this race
though you run for all eternity?
Your youngest brother's passed you by
at last: he's older now than you
and all our lives have ramified
in meanings which you never knew.
And yet, your eyes still burn with joy,
your body's splendor never fades
sometimes I seek to follow you
across the greenness, into the shade
of that great forest in whose depths
houses await and lives are lived,
where you haste in gleeful search of me
bearing a message I must have
but I, before I change, must bide
the "days of my appointed time,"
and so I age from self to self
while you await me, always young.
How
many contemporary poems can hold that much straight-forward emotion
so successfully? Morgan doesn't talk around his subjects. He addresses
them with a directness we are unaccustomed to seeing.
|