Like gladiator games and pyramid building, opera has always
been a gloriously money-losing proposition. It is the most extravagant
of arts, requiring the constant support of kings, dictators,
plutocrats, and town councils. Box-office success is no solution.
San Francisco Opera loses money at every sold-out performance.
Sane business practices simply don’t suffice. Composer
Richard Wagner’s patron, King Ludwig II of Bavaria, was
the ideal operatic angel–very rich and certifiably insane.
Mel Brooks’ shyster producer Max Bialystock need not have
mounted Springtime for Hitler to score a surefire loss.
Aida would have done just fine.
What perpetuates
such madness? As with any addiction, the dangerous allure of
opera remains puzzling to those who have never experienced its
exquisite high. Opera’s appeal is not solely the extraordinary
beauty of its music or the compelling nature of its stagecraft.
One can find those particular qualities in the concert hall
or theater. No, there is a special emotional alchemy that only
opera offers. On the right night at the right performance, the
operagoer is transported into the suffering or ecstatic soul
of an imaginary character and fully, utterly, almost unbearably
shares his or her emotions. This literally transcendental experience
usually lasts for just ten or 15 minutes. But the listener never
forgets–and craves it ever afterward.
Go ahead
and doubt me, but I speak from long experience in the teeming
opium dens of opera. I have watched threadbare graduate students
go without meals to afford a standing-room ticket to hear their
favorite diva. I have seen iron-hearted industrialists lean
forward in their seats at a performance of La Bohème
and begin to weep. Such men close small-town factories without
scruple and joyously plunder union pension funds, but they sob
in a darkened theater beside the deathbed of an imaginary seamstress.
Is it any wonder they write big checks to perpetuate their shameful
vice? No addict wants the supply interrupted.
So nothing
worries or excites opera fanatics more than a key change in
company management. It is not an abstract event, but one that
has a tangible emotional impact on their lives. Such a change
has just occurred in San Francisco. Last month, Pamela Rosenberg
replaced Lotfi Mansouri (who has retired), becoming the new
general director of San Francisco Opera. And many aficionados
are worried that the new regime will radically transform the
city’s long-established opera culture.
In local
terms, Rosenberg’s succession is a rare event. San Francisco
Opera has been a bastion of steady management and artistic continuity.
Rosenberg is only the fifth general director in nearly 80 years.
The first two directors, Gaetano Merola and Kurt Adler, ruled
for more than half a century. Rosenberg is not only the first
woman to command the great institution; this Berkeley-educated
impresario is also the first native-born American to do so.
She has spent her entire career in Europe, however, mostly in
Germany.
Rosenberg
now finds herself in an extraordinarily privileged position.
Internationally respected, musically distinguished, and financially
sound, San Francisco Opera boasts the largest budget of any
arts organization on the West Coast. It has presented world-class
opera for 78 uninterrupted seasons–maintained through
both the Great Depression and World War II, not to mention a
major earthquake. Larger than any other opera company in North
America except for New York’s Metropolitan, it has an
additional advantage that few arts organizations anywhere can
match: The city loves it.
San Francisco
has cherished opera since the gold-rush days, when performances
took place in beer gardens and dance halls. No sooner did Italian
émigré conductor Merola officially create the
San Francisco Opera in 1923 than it became the city’s
preeminent institution, in both cultural and social terms. On
any opening night, one can spot Silicon Valley moguls, famous
winemakers, academic glitterati, and international music journalists
rubbing shoulders with local politicians and the old-line San
Francisco elite. No large American city has such a close and
affectionate relationship with its opera company, and that is
a tradition to cherish.
San Francisco
Opera’s other notable tradition has been great singing.
There are currently two basic ways of thinking about opera production.
The first places musical values, especially singing, foremost.
Most large American opera companies follow this approach, which
generally pleases conservative, established audiences. The second
puts innovative theatrical values foremost, especially in the
direction and stage design. This approach, usually called "director’s
opera," is prominent in Europe, most notably in Germany,
where it is considered almost mandatory for a new production
to be interpretive and conceptual. The two philosophies are
not necessarily opposed. An innovative production can be magnificently
sung and conducted. But in practice, a management with limited
time and resources tends to begin planning a production based
on one approach or the other.
San Francisco
Opera has long concentrated on magnificent singing. Both Merola
and Adler were practicing musicians who were renowned judges
of vocal work. San Francisco Opera became famous not only for
booking the most notable stars of the day, but also for discovering
new talent. Legendary international stars such as Birgit Nilsson
and Leontyne Price made their American debuts here.
The singing
was often less splendid during the Mansouri regime (1988—2001).
The Iran-born Mansouri, whose background was in stage directing,
brought to the institution more managerial professionalism than
musical magic. A skilled caretaker rather than a visionary,
he broadened the company’s repertory, oversaw the renovation
of the War Memorial Opera House after the 1989 earthquake, and
pioneered the use of supertitles. (This technical innovation
finally allowed monolingual American audiences to understand
what was happening onstage and helped turn opera into classical
music’s only growth industry.) Mansouri’s productions
were eclectic, lavishly staged, well conducted, and solidly
sung.
Rosenberg
was a bold choice to replace him. For the prior nine years,
she directed the Stuttgart Opera, which Germany’s Opernwelt
magazine named the best opera company of the year three times
during her tenure. Stuttgart is a repertory company that produces
a great many operas in numerous performances–a typical
situation for a major German house. Under such circumstances,
it is impossible to book (or afford) the most celebrated singers.
Except for special gala evenings, the German solution has been
to make the director and the production the stars, and Stuttgart
is celebrated for its experimental productions of classic works.
What worries
local aficionados is that Rosenberg will try to turn San Francisco
into a high-concept German opera house–long on postmodern
pretension and short on traditional vocalism. Having seen some
critically acclaimed and truly awful conceptual Eurotrash productions
(one of which set Wagner’s Ring des Nibelungen
in outer space), I understand those worries. A tradition like
San Francisco’s is extraordinarily hard to build but all
too easy to destroy.
What comforts
me is Rosenberg herself. She is smart, experienced, and pragmatic.
She is also a genuine intellectual–probably the first
ever to occupy her post. At times, her plans for the opera (which
include thematic programming, such as operas devoted to "Women
Outside of Society" and "The Faust Project")
appear more conceptual than musical, but she seems committed
to opera as a musical medium and says she’s "passionate
about musical values." Her decision to keep conductor Donald
Runnicles, a guiding force in the company’s high standards,
as music director certainly supports her claim.
The new
era has already begun. Although Mansouri planned this fall’s
season, Rosenberg has been making casting changes. (Rumors are
flying through the gossipy singers’ network of her canceling
the contracts of two lavishly paid superstars–perhaps
a smart economic move but a dubious artistic one.) She has hired
Wolfgang Willaschek as the opera’s first dramaturg, or
literary adviser, a role standard in Germany but rare in the
United States–a sure sign of her European sensibility.
Meanwhile, she has begun an ambitious project to mount all the
operas of Hector Berlioz and Leos÷ Janác÷ek
as well as the first U.S. staged production of Olivier Messiaen’s
visionary modernist masterpiece Saint François d’Assise.
Sounds
great to me, though I wish I had heard her talk with more enthusiasm
about the core Italian repertory that has been the city’s
pride and pleasure. It is nice to imagine that Rosenberg can
cultivate both Teutonic insight and Italian ecstasy. But if
we have to choose just one, give me ecstasy.
The Opera
season begins with a revival of Verdi’s Rigoletto, Sept.
7, War Memorial Opera House, 301 Van Ness Ave., S.F., (415)
861-4008.
|